要在Excel中计算复合年增长率，有一个基本公式 =（（结束值/起始值）^（1 /周期）-1。 我们可以很容易地应用这个公式如下：
1。 选择一个空白单元格，例如Cell E3，在其中输入以下公式，然后按 输入 键。 看截图：
2。 在某些情况下，计算结果可能不会格式化为百分比。 请继续选择计算结果，单击 百分比样式 按键 在 主页 选项卡将数字更改为百分比格式，然后单击更改其小数位数 增加十进制 按键 or 减小十进制 按键 。 查看屏幕截图：
注意：在Cell F3中输入= C3，在单元格G3中输入= B3，在单元格F4中输入= -C12，在单元格G4中输入= B12，或者您可以直接在此表格中输入原始数据。 顺便说一句，您必须在结束值之前添加减号。
2。 选择此表下方的空白单元格，在其中输入以下公式，然后按 输入 键。
3。 要将结果更改为百分比格式，请选择具有此XIRR功能的单元格，然后单击 百分比样式 按键 在 主页 选项卡，然后单击更改其小数位 增加十进制 按键 or 减小十进制 按键 。 查看屏幕截图：
要计算excel中的平均年增长率，通常我们必须用公式计算每年的年增长率 =（结束值 - 开始值）/开始值，然后平均这些年增长率。 你可以这样做：
2。 选择Range D4：D12，单击 百分比样式 按键 在 主页 选项卡，然后单击更改其小数位 增加十进制 按键 or 减小十进制 按键 。 看截图：
3。 将下面的公式输入Cell F4，平均所有年增长率，然后按 输入 键。
You are guest ( Sign Up? )
or post as a guest, but your post won't be published automatically.
To post as a guest, your comment is unpublished.
To post as a guest, your comment is unpublished.· 1 years agoHi - I'm trying to work backwards to find the highest price I can buy a share at when I have a total expected return. Are you able to please help me by reverse engineering the formula to work this out. Using your example - I'm trying to work out what the "3" should be 2.43443 =(3200/x)^(1/(40-8))-1
To post as a guest, your comment is unpublished.· 1 years agoHi,
I have 7 fiscal years of foot traffic data for a retail store:
FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18
2653 2848 2871 2925 2685 2923 3000
My question is: while traffic is increasing, is it increasing at a decreasing rate? Is the growth slowing?
Your first example "(B11/B2)^(1/(10-1))-1" takes the end value and beginning value to get the CAGR. The part I don't understand is that, what about the values in the middle? How does only taking the end and beginning value determine the growth rate accurately? Is there another method where it takes all the fiscal year values into account?
To post as a guest, your comment is unpublished.· 1 years agoFY12 - 2653
FY13 - 2848
FY14 - 2871
FY15 - 2925
FY16 - 2685
FY17 - 2923
FY18 - 3000
To post as a guest, your comment is unpublished.· 1 years agoCan someone help with this problem using excel?
The following data show average growth of the human embryo prior to birth.
EMBRYO AGE IN WEEKS WEIGHT IN GRAMS
a). Find the quadratic function of “best fit” for this data. Write this function in standard form: f(x) = ax2 + bx + c.
b). Make a sketch of the scatter plot and the parabola. Plot the quadratic function found above the Y = menu.
c). According to your model, what would a 32-week embryo weigh?
d). According to your model, what week would an embryo weigh 3000 grams?
e). Could the model be used for weight of an embryo for any number of weeks age (such as 100 or 200)? Explain
To post as a guest, your comment is unpublished.· 2 years agoThere is a new tool that will fit to your planning software.
MS Excel is a spreadsheet developed by Microsoft for Windows, macOS, Android and iOS.
It features calculation, graphing tools, pivot tables, and a macro programming language called Visual Basic for Applications.
Thus, it can do Bookkeeping/Accounting, Budgeting (Existing Year and Long Term) and Data Analysis.
To post as a guest, your comment is unpublished.· 2 years agoIn the CAGR formula, why we are using -1 at the end.
I am using two formulaes 1) (I5/I4)^(1/(25-1))-1
2)(I5/I4)^(1/(25)-1) which one is correct..?
Please help me out on this thank you.
To post as a guest, your comment is unpublished.· 2 years agoThe formula is actually CORRECT, but the explanation is incorrect. There are 10 dates that represent 9 periods. It should say that "n-1" means "dates-1", not "periods - 1".
You can verify it yourself by increasing each year by this example's n-1 CAGR and you will get the final result.
To post as a guest, your comment is unpublished.· 2 years agoThe original formula is CORRECT, but its explanation is wrong; It confuses the number of dates shown with the number of periods. In the example, there are ten dates listed but they extend over only 9 years (periods). That is why there is a minus 1.Try it yourself by calculating each year's increase at the CAGR of 6.5257% and you will get the correct ending answer.
To post as a guest, your comment is unpublished.· 1 months agothank you. Strange only two others seem to have noticed this. I'd like to know why doesn't the formula just say to put in the actual number of periods, such as the 9 periods shown instead of ten minus one? Actually gave the correct formula n=number of periods) which is smart, because then eveeryone can use it for say 4/1/xx to 9/31/xx and actually list the number of periods in years with a decimal to represent the part of the year related to thte number of months between the beginning of April to the end of Sept
To post as a guest, your comment is unpublished.· 2 years agoAs noted above, this formula is INCORRECT and misleading (especially since it's the first Google result). Please correct!
To post as a guest, your comment is unpublished.· 2 years agoI need the amount $20,000 @ 8% & 10% would be after 30 years compounded growth please. Thank you, Ramsy
To post as a guest, your comment is unpublished.· 3 years agoAgree with MANOJ - the formula is wrong. it is not n-1
To post as a guest, your comment is unpublished.· 3 years agoHi Bro,
Your Formula for CAGR: [quote][b]=((End Value/Start Value)^(1/(Periods - 1)) -1[/b] [/quote] highlighted in blue is incorrect.
The correct CAGR formula is:
= ((FV/PV)^(1/n)) - 1
FV: Future Value
PV: Present Value
n: Number of years